![]() |
Cheltenham Liberal Democrats Campaigning to win with Martin Horwood |
![]() |
| <info@cheltlibdems.org.uk> | Cheltenham Liberal Democrats | 10th March 2010 |
Government forcing up council tax in Gloucestershire10.32.00am BST (GMT +0100) Thu 11th Oct 2007 LIBERAL Democrats in Gloucestershire have warned that council tax could rocket over the next three years because of the government's decision to squeeze the cash given to councils. For every pound spent by councils, on average, 75p of it comes from central government as part of a cash grant to help pay for local services. But the government's spending plans for the next three years, called the Comprehensive Spending Review, will slam on the brakes and massively restrict the money Whitehall based ministers give to councils. Liberal Democrats in Gloucestershire have warned that Gloucestershire County Council may be forced by the spending decision of the Labour government to increase council tax well above inflation. Cllr Jeremy Hilton, Liberal Democrat group leader, said: "Labour's spending plans are based on council tax rising at double the rate of inflation over the next three years. That will mean big council tax increases for residents of Gloucestershire. "Labour have no plans to reform council tax, the most unfair tax in the country. The Conservatives will also keep council tax. But Labour are making a bad situation worse by forcing up council tax by more than inflation. "This is bad news in particular for the elderly residents of Gloucestershire who have fixed incomes or who saved all their lives and as a result are refused council tax benefit. "Council tax is a rotten system and needs to be replaced by a fair system based on ability to pay, not used to bail out Labour's cash black hole."
Bookmark this story at:
Related News Stories:Thu 26th Jun 2008: Council backs doubling of trains in Gloucestershire. Wed 7th Nov 2007: Published and promoted by Cheltenham Liberal Democrats (David Lawrence), 16 Hewlett Road,Cheltenham, GL52 6AA. The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider. |